As a writer, I look at the things written in the Bible
through my writer’s eye to help me understand how things were written. As an English professor, I teach my students
that they must look at all aspects of a reading to understand it. I feel that the Bible is no different.
I enjoyed reading the book of Acts. It was a great story.
Luke was a good storyteller.
I do feel like some details were omitted from the book. I understand time constraints and things like
that. The book of Acts could easily be a
book series that details Paul’s travels.
There were so many good elements to the stories. There were great characters who you could get
invested in. The protagonist, Paul, the
apostle was introduced in an exhilarating way.
He story was well-developed and he changed in the story. His story arc was good. Peter, the Apostle’s story was interwoven in
an exceptional way that help us see him in contrast to Paul. There were so many supporting characters that
were written in a way that you grew to love them in the short time that you got
to know them.
I am making a special note about the Holy Spirit as a character in the story. I could even venture to say that He is the narrator of the story. He is the most important character in the story because He helped everyone in the story operate in a way that moved the building and establishing of the first church along. He directed the people, the movement, the actions, the moments in a way that no other character could have done. I would venture to say, if there was no Holy Spirit in Acts, then there would be no Book of Acts. Huber L. Drumwright, Jr. writes in THE HOLY SPIRIT IN THE BOOK OF ACTS, “a recognition of the unusual importance of the Holy Spirit in Acts is completely justified… “The full title of the book of Acts is The Acts of the Apostles. That title could equally well read The Acts of the Holy Spirit.” ” This statement rings true to me.
The settings of the stories were interesting and
exciting. There was not much world
building in the story, but because the places in the story were real places, the
places gave a frame of reference. There were
lots of repeats of the places in the story.
The conflict in the stories were varied and exciting. There was light violence, internal struggles,
fall outs between friends, battles with nature, spiritual warfare, and tussles
with political figures. There was much
conflict to move the stories.
There was so much suspense and drama. There were a couple of
times where we could ask, “Are they going to make it?” We could ask, “What is going to happen next?” Of course, with all the conflict in the
stories, there was plenty of drama to go around.
The dialogue in the book was enjoyable. I do feel like more dialogue could have been
added, but that is just me. Each
character had a unique voice. They were
different, sounded different, and had a view point of their own.
There was death in the book.
Sadness came with the first death in the book. It was an amazing scene that caused us to
feel for the character who died.
There was a natural story arc that flowed from beginning to
end. The plot was well defined. There was a useful story structure.
There was a clear narrative voice that directed the story
from scene to scene.
There was one central theme through out the entire book –
the Holy Spirit operating to move the progress of the church forward.
The ending left me wanting more. We get a sense of the end of Paul’s life, but
his death is not mentioned. I would have
liked to have seen that.
I read it along side a dramatized version of the Bible on
YouTube, which made the reading more exciting.
My favorite characters were Barnabas and Tabitha. I feel like I match those two characters best
in my walk with Christ. My favorite
conflict was when Paul called out Peter for being hypocritical when the Jews
came to visit in Antioch. Paul called
Peter by his government name. This was a
great story.
The Bible has so many genres of writing in it. It is an amazing book. Looking at it as a writer always makes me
appreciate the Word of God more.